The result is that the aesthetic judgement refers not merely, as a judgement of taste, to the beautiful, but also, as springing from a higher intellectual feeling, to the sublime. Hence the above-mentioned Critique of Aesthetic judgement must be divided on these lines into two main parts.英文原著 · 《The Critique of Judgement》
SEC1|BK1 FIRST PART CRITIQUE OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT SECTION I. ANALYTIC OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT. BOOK I. Analytic of the Beautiful.英文原著 · 《The Critique of Judgement》
Given representations in a judgement may be empirical, and so aesthetic; but the judgement which is pronounced by their means is logical, provided it refers them to the object. Conversely, be the given representations even rational, but referred in a judgement solely to the subject (to its feeling), they are always to that extent aesthetic.英文原著 · 《The Critique of Judgement》
SEC1|BK2 FIRST PART CRITIQUE OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT SECTION I. ANALYTIC OF AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT. BOOK II. Analytic of the Sublime.英文原著 · 《The Critique of Judgement》
But in this very way the aesthetic judgement itself is subjectively final for reason as source of ideas, i.e., of such an intellectual comprehension as makes all aesthetic comprehension small, and the object is received as sublime with a pleasure that is only possible through the mediation of a displeasure.英文原著 · 《The Critique of Judgement》
Deduction of Pure Aesthetic Judgements. SS 30. The deduction of aesthetic judgements upon objects of nature must not be directed to what we call sublime in nature, but only to the beautiful.英文原著 · 《The Critique of Judgement》
No, the whole "reclaimed wood aesthetic" is an insulting appropriation of barn culture.美剧 · 《Modern Family》